RE: [eia] British land phase, 2/07

["James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The rule you are refering to is 4.6.6 which states that a corps is required
to be in the minor country in order to conquer it _unless_ the conquering
major power is also at war with the controlling major power, which JJ is in
this case.  So, at this point a garrison is enough to satisfy the
requirements for conquest laid out in 7.7 and 10.2.1 (one months
uninterrupted and unbesieged occupation).

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Kyle H
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 8:25 AM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] British land phase, 2/07


JJ wrote:
> 1 Neapolitan:  Rome (drop 1 I) ---> Naples (f/ 5-)

     Didn't we find some obscure rule in the last game that says that a
corps must remain in a minor country in order to conquer it?  (A garrison
isn't enough.)

kdh


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia