RE: [eia] Prussian forage roll

["Nate Ellefson" <nellefson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm presuming Mike made a typo when he said the Saxons are reduced to
4I, since, in addition to the fact that I also had them starting at 4I,
if they had started the turn with 6I he would have to have foraged at
3-, not 4-.  I agree that they should have 2I remaining.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of J.J. Young
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 7:56 AM
> To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> Subject: Re: [eia] Prussian forage roll
> 
> 
> Kyle and I both showed the Saxony corps at 4 I at the 
> beginning of January, which would put its current strength at 
> 2 I.  Maybe I forgot about something ?
> 
> -JJY
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] Prussian forage roll
> 
> 
> > At 11:55 AM 4/13/2005, you wrote:
> > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >Dice rolls requested by: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx> Rolls 
> > >sent to:
> > >    eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > ># Saxon forage on 4-
> > >
> > >No. of sides on every die:      6
> > >No. of dice for every roll:     1
> > >No. of dice rolls requested:    1
> > >No. of rolls per line:          1
> > >
> > >   6
> > >
> > Not the most auspicious beginning for the phase.  The Saxons lose 2 
> > factors, reducing them to 4.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia