Joel Uckelman on Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:13 -0600 (CST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Austrian Land Phase, Dec. '06


Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> At 08:17 AM 3/10/2005, you wrote:
> >It would seem I've been operating the whole time on a misunderstanding
> >about where depots can and cannot be placed.  Interesting that I
> >apparently haven't broken the rule before.
> >
> >So it looks like if I replace the depot at Ulm and move the depot NE of
> >Kassel to Frankfurt I should be fine.  That will increase my expenses by
> >$8, to $39 for the month.
> >
> >The corps at Lyon will stay in place.
> 
> As long as you have the extra $8 that works just fine.  I wasn't sure how 
> much cash you'd set aside so didn't know how big an issue that would turn 
> out to be.

Mike, there's a breach at Konigsberg for you to respond to, in case you 
missed it. (Also a breach at Damascus for Kyle to respond to.)

-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia