Re: [eia] manpower collection

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I also agree that unless the capital cities are occupied by unbesieged enemy
forces, France should still get manpower from those provinces.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] manpower collection


>     I agree.
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 5:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] manpower collection
>
>
> > Thus spake "James Helle":
> > > Reading rule 8.2.2 leads me to believe that since there are
"unbesieged
> =
> > > enemy forces" in St. Malo and LaRochelle that France will not collect
=
> > > manpower from these provinces, even though French factors control the
=
> > > cities.  Is this the consensus?
> > >
> > > JRH
> >
> > The enemy forces aren't *in* the cities, though. So you should still
> collect
> > manpower from those provinces.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia