Re: [eia] manpower collection

Joel Uckelman on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:09:10 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] manpower collection

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] manpower collection
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:09:08 -0600
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:01:33 PST." <001f01c4fccf$5bb93230$c646fc04@hppav>

Thus spake "James Helle":
> Reading rule 8.2.2 leads me to believe that since there are "unbesieged =
> enemy forces" in St. Malo and LaRochelle that France will not collect =
> manpower from these provinces, even though French factors control the =
> cities.  Is this the consensus?
>
> JRH

The enemy forces aren't *in* the cities, though. So you should still collect
manpower from those provinces.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] manpower collection
  - From: Kyle H

References:
- [eia] manpower collection
  - From: James Helle

Prev by Date: [eia] manpower collection
Next by Date: [eia] Russian Naval Phase, September 1806
Previous by thread: [eia] manpower collection
Next by thread: Re: [eia] manpower collection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread