Re: [eia] Austrian land phase, July '06, part 2

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    But if they already foraged at 5-, then how could they also lay siege to
Paris?  Did you mean to say that they foraged at 3-?

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Austrian land phase, July '06, part 2


> The Austrian corps with Wellington had already foraged successfully (their
> target was 5-), so spending that $3 is unneccesary.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nate Ellefson" <nellefson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'public list for an Empires in Arms game'" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:25 AM
> Subject: [eia] Austrian land phase, July '06, part 2
>
>
> > Including part 1:
> >
> > Depot creation: Namur, Ulm ($2)
> >
> > Bavarian corps -- drop 1I in Brussels --> Strasbourg --> Zurich ($2)
> > Venetian corps (w/ Mack) --> W of Zurich ($1)
> > 1I W of Nuremburg --> Ulm ($0.5)
> > 1I Cologne -- drop 1M --> Nuremburg ($1)
> > 1I Paris --> W of Paris ($3)
> > 3C, 7I (w/ Charles) --> Paris
> >
> > The army in Paris are paid for with $2 from the British depot in Paris,
> > $8 from the British depot in Lille, and $6 from the Austrian depot in
> > Namur.  Total cost for Austria is $16.  Siege rolls at Zurich and Paris
> > to follow.
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia