Kyle H on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:04:10 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] defender attacks decisions |
For the record, I disagree with Joel and agree with Jim. kdh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [eia] defender attacks decisions > Thus spake "James Helle": > > Joel, you said "I think so". Is this referring to seeing the results or > > committing? > > All supply is resolved prior to land combat; the decision on whether to > do an assualt happens duing the land combat portion of the turn. So JJ > should be able to see the result of foraging prior to deciding whether to > commit to an attack with the garrison. > > Most of the time the forage result won't affect the decision, so usual > practice has been to declare prior to foraging beccause it's faster that > way. But in cases where the moving player does care, the rules permit the > moving player to wait for the forage result. > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia