Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels

Joel Uckelman on Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:13:03 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:13:02 -0600
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:50:09 EST." <003201c4dbee$936a8eb0$3c4e4b0c@KylesDell4500>

Thus spake "Kyle H":
> 
> > Hohenloe slips away.  Since I don't have access to Kleves, I believe I end
> > up retreating to Breda
> 
>     BTW, did we ever decide who controls Kleves?  Who volunteered to sponsor
> it?  (I know Turkey did not.)  Whoever volunteered should roll to see who
> controls it.

Russia was the only volunteer, so got it by default.
 
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

References:
- Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
  - From: Kyle H

Prev by Date: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
Next by Date: RE: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
Next by thread: RE: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread