Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels

Kyle H on Mon, 6 Dec 2004 17:51:54 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels

To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:50:09 -0500
References: <mailbox-13766-1102369642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6.1.0.6.0.20041206155253.01af8db8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Hohenloe slips away.  Since I don't have access to Kleves, I believe I end
> up retreating to Breda

    BTW, did we ever decide who controls Kleves?  Who volunteered to sponsor
it?  (I know Turkey did not.)  Whoever volunteered should roll to see who
controls it.

kdh

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
  - From: Joel Uckelman
- RE: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
  - From: Nate Ellefson

References:
- [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
  - From: escrow
- Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
  - From: Michael Gorman

Prev by Date: Re: [eia] Siege at Brussels
Next by Date: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
Next by thread: Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle at Brussels
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread