James Helle on Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:04:35 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Third Prussian roll at Dresden |
The "three" was a typo, guys. I did deduct six infantry as casualties. Sorry for the confusion. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:27 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Third Prussian roll at Dresden > At 08:40 PM 10/12/2004, you wrote: > >So the Prussians kill three French infantry factors as they run away. Nice > >shooting, Mike. :) > > > >BTW Mike, the corps at Wittenburg traveled through the Brandenburg area and > >do _not_ cross the river. I wanted to be clear about this in case it > >affected your chit choice. > > Thanks for that detail. > > The French also should have lost six factors since the flanking force > counts as double its number of factors for casualty causing. So even > though they looked like a mere 22 factors, they fought like 39. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia