J.J. Young on Mon, 4 Oct 2004 17:39:50 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] So to sum up... |
It seems clear to me that in this situation Spain must "sue for peace to all major powers with which it is at war", but that whether or not to _accept_ a demand for unconditional surrender is a separate step, and the answer given can be different to different opponents. If the opponents don't like it, then they could always offer conditional peace, which cannot be refused. A major power in serious trouble may still have incentive to surrender to everyone at once, to avoid paying multiple PP costs for surrenders in different months. So I think Spain could sue both GB and Turkey for peace and, since both demanded unconditional surrender, choose to accept that from one, both, or neither. I don't really consider this to my advantage, BTW, but I believe that by the rules Danny should be able to do what he seems to want; surrender unconditionally to GB while refusing Turkey's demand and staying at war with Kyle. Are there any opposing views ? If not, is this really what Spain wants ? -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [eia] So to sum up... > At 02:55 PM 10/4/2004, you wrote: > >Here is my present understanding of the possible peace process: > > > >1.) In order to make peace this month, Spain would have to surrender to > >both GB and Turkey. > > > >2.) Both GB and Turkey have requested unconditional surrender. > > Since Spain has sued for peace to both nations it is at war with, is it > required by 4.4.2.1 to accept both offers or neither or can Spain choose to > accept only one of the unconditional demands? > > If they were conditional demands Spain would have no choice, but since both > Britain and Turkey have chosen unconditional, they've given Spain another > choice to remain at war or surrender. Does the requirement for suing for > peace still apply or has it been met in Spain's initial request for terms > to both powers it is at war with? > > It's not clear to me which way I'm supposed to read 4.4.2 as far as how > much distance there is between the initial suing for peace and the actual > surrender. > > Sorry to add another round of complexity to this, but it probably is > important to figure out exactly how to end a war. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia