J.J. Young on Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:11:57 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805


Request denied.  We urge you to surrender to prevent any further bloodshed.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805


> Both garrisons request honors of war..
> JRH
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 11:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805
>
>
> > There are lots of decisions pending from France:
> >
> > Will the garrison at Brest surrender or fight ?
> >
> > Will the garrison at La Rochelle surrender or fight ?
> >
> > If Brest surrenders or falls, will the French IV fleet scuttle or attack
> the
> > blockaders ?
> >
> > If La Rochelle surrenders or falls, will the French II fleet scuttle or
> > attack the blockaders ?
> >
> > -JJY
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805
> >
> >
> > > Yes, that cav should have showed up in August.  I wrote September in
my
> > > notes.
> > > JRH
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:46 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805
> > >
> > >
> > > > Was the cavalry factor supposed to be added last month, Jim ?
> September
> > > is
> > > > an infantry reinforcement month.  If the cav factor was purchased in
> > > March,
> > > > then it was due to arrive in August (5 months later).
> > > >
> > > > Since you were generous and allowed Austria to place their forgotten
> > > > reinforcements retroactively (even though reinforcements are
supposed
> to
> > > be
> > > > use 'em or lose 'em), I have no objection to returning the favor to
> > > France.
> > > > I think that Nate and Mike should also be heard from on this,
though.
> > In
> > > > any case, let's all keep careful track from here on out, especially
> for
> > > > cavalry factors which are so expensive !
> > > >
> > > > -JJY
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:16 PM
> > > > Subject: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > One cavalry factor is added to the Holland corps.  ( Thanks JJ! )
> > > > >
> > > > > France will move last in the land phase.  And next time I will try
> to
> > > > remember to include this.  :)
> > > > >
> > > > > JRH
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > eia mailing list
> > > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > eia mailing list
> > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia