J.J. Young on Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:11:57 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805 |
Request denied. We urge you to surrender to prevent any further bloodshed. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 7:05 PM Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805 > Both garrisons request honors of war.. > JRH > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 11:22 PM > Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805 > > > > There are lots of decisions pending from France: > > > > Will the garrison at Brest surrender or fight ? > > > > Will the garrison at La Rochelle surrender or fight ? > > > > If Brest surrenders or falls, will the French IV fleet scuttle or attack > the > > blockaders ? > > > > If La Rochelle surrenders or falls, will the French II fleet scuttle or > > attack the blockaders ? > > > > -JJY > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:02 PM > > Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805 > > > > > > > Yes, that cav should have showed up in August. I wrote September in my > > > notes. > > > JRH > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:46 PM > > > Subject: Re: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805 > > > > > > > > > > Was the cavalry factor supposed to be added last month, Jim ? > September > > > is > > > > an infantry reinforcement month. If the cav factor was purchased in > > > March, > > > > then it was due to arrive in August (5 months later). > > > > > > > > Since you were generous and allowed Austria to place their forgotten > > > > reinforcements retroactively (even though reinforcements are supposed > to > > > be > > > > use 'em or lose 'em), I have no objection to returning the favor to > > > France. > > > > I think that Nate and Mike should also be heard from on this, though. > > In > > > > any case, let's all keep careful track from here on out, especially > for > > > > cavalry factors which are so expensive ! > > > > > > > > -JJY > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:16 PM > > > > Subject: [eia] French naval/reinf. phase (addendum)- Sep. 1805 > > > > > > > > > > > > > One cavalry factor is added to the Holland corps. ( Thanks JJ! ) > > > > > > > > > > France will move last in the land phase. And next time I will try > to > > > > remember to include this. :) > > > > > > > > > > JRH > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > eia mailing list > > > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > eia mailing list > > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > eia mailing list > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia