Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, July '05

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake "Kyle H":
>     Ok, here's the deal I'm willing to make.  If you get to change the
> location of one of your corps after I've sent out my land orders and rolled
> for forage, then I get to rewrite my land orders while keeping my previous
> forage rolls.  I think that's only fair.
> 
>     Kushanz Ali will remain at Kiev.
>     The Inf. Corps that originally moved to the space W. of Ekaterinoslav
> will move to Ekaterinoslav instead and lay siege.  (F/4-, the roll was 4)
>     The Cav Corps that originally moved to the space W. of Ekaterinoslav
> will move to Ismael instead.  (F/4-, the roll was 4)
>     I will make my siege roll at Ekaterinoslav.
> 
> kdh

I agree to the changes here, in this case only because the forage effects are
minimal. I am still opposed to keeping rolls of any sort when the moves they
accompany are changed retroactively.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia