Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, July '05

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Ok, here's the deal I'm willing to make.  If you get to change the
location of one of your corps after I've sent out my land orders and rolled
for forage, then I get to rewrite my land orders while keeping my previous
forage rolls.  I think that's only fair.

    Kushanz Ali will remain at Kiev.
    The Inf. Corps that originally moved to the space W. of Ekaterinoslav
will move to Ekaterinoslav instead and lay siege.  (F/4-, the roll was 4)
    The Cav Corps that originally moved to the space W. of Ekaterinoslav
will move to Ismael instead.  (F/4-, the roll was 4)
    I will make my siege roll at Ekaterinoslav.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, July '05


>     Man, this is pretty crappy.  I've spent the last hour or so pouring
over
> the combat charts trying to decide what chit to choose.  Plus, I've
already
> made forage rolls on the assumption that your orders were correct and
> complete.  I'm not sure how I feel about this...
>
> kdh
>
> > The corps you're attacking was supposed to have been east of
> Ekaterinovslav,
> > not west, so you may want to redo your orders to reflect that. I
> appologize
> > for the numerous errors in my orders this time around.
> >

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia