J.J. Young on Thu, 20 May 2004 22:39:28 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] 2nd round recap |
For whatever it's worth, I agree with Joel's interpretation here. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:02 PM Subject: Re: [eia] 2nd round recap > Thus spake "Kyle H": > > Am I right in thinking that the cossack currently at Silistra must now > > make a roll at 4- or be destroyed? If the roll is made, then it can be > > retreated to any adjacent space that does not contain a Turkish corps. ... > > Well, after taking a second look at the wording, I guess the rule I was > > just invoking only applies if the cossack is "attacked". And since my corps > > are moving to Silistra as part of a retreat and not part of an attack, I > > guess that rule wouldn't apply. Am I interpreting this right? > > > > kdh > > The cossack is only attacked if some of your corps end their movement > there. Movement is over once combat starts, so I think the cossack remains > there. > > -- > J. > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia