J.J. Young on Thu, 20 May 2004 22:39:28 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] 2nd round recap


For whatever it's worth, I agree with Joel's interpretation here.

-JJY

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] 2nd round recap


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> >     Am I right in thinking that the cossack currently at Silistra must
now
> > make a roll at 4- or be destroyed?  If the roll is made, then it can be
> > retreated to any adjacent space that does not contain a Turkish corps.
...
> >     Well, after taking a second look at the wording, I guess the rule I
was
> > just invoking only applies if the cossack is "attacked".  And since my
corps
> > are moving to Silistra as part of a retreat and not part of an attack, I
> > guess that rule wouldn't apply.  Am I interpreting this right?
> >
> > kdh
>
> The cossack is only attacked if some of your corps end their movement
> there. Movement is over once combat starts, so I think the cossack remains
> there.
>
> -- 
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia