J.J. Young on Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:32:49 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] access adjustments ? |
Great Britain grants Austrian, Prussian, and Russian-controlled forces unlimited access to Baden, Hesse, Tuscany, and Wurttemburg until further notice. God Save the King ! -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:33 PM Subject: Re: [eia] access adjustments ? > Thus spake "Kyle H": > > I think that adjusting Voluntary Access in response to Minor Country > > Control was justified in this particular instance because there was so much > > action with regard to Minor Countries being attacked. But let's not forget > > that usually Voluntary Access decisions are made and sent in with the > > Political Phase escrow. (In the last game, a Voluntary Access amendment was > > rejected because it was not made at the proper time.) > > So I just want to make sure everyone is aware that we are making an > > exception to the rule in this case, but we shouldn't expect to be able to > > make such Voluntary Access amendments all the time. > > > > kdh > > Here's my concern with this: Do I need to write conditional access orders > for each minor I don't control, every month, just in case I end up > controlling it? That seems overly cumbersome to me. Access agreements do > occur after minor control is assigned. > > This never occurred to me as an issue last game, probably because I wasn't > frequently attempting to control minors myself. > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia