Re: [eia] issues to be addressed

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Actually, better wording for the phrase that I suggested we add might
be:  "that is no more than 2 spaces from a friendly controlled city."
    I don't want to say that you *can't* be repatriated to a city.  I just
want to say that you can't end up too far away.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] issues to be addressed


> > > 5.)  JJ's arctic circle scenario can be resolved by adding the
following
> =
> > > phrase to the end of the first sentence of rule 4.4.6.2:  "...that is
=
> > > within 2 spaces of a friendly-controlled city."  (Maybe we already did
=
> > > this and I just forgot?)
> > >
> > > kdh
> >
> > What was this, again? It's been a while...
> >
>
>     Way back at the end of the British/Spanish war against Russia, JJ was
> concerned that some of his forces near St. Petersburg might have to be
> repatriated to the northern-most mountain spaces of Norway, if we followed
> the repatriation rules by the letter.  In the end, we did not follow them
by
> the letter.  Instead, we allowed the British forces to repatriate to
> Spanish-controlled Abo (in Finland).  We pledged to fix this problem, but
I
> don't think we ever did.  It shouldn't be difficult to fix.  Adding the
> phrase I suggested above should do the trick.
>
> kdh
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia