RE: [eia] potential replacement

["nellefson" <nellefson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

First, I'm happy to be here, and thanks for the invitation.

Second, I'd be fine with picking up where the game currently is, but my
preference would be to start over.  My proposal is that if anyone feels
strongly one way or the other, make that opinion known, and I'll be
happy to accommodate.  In lieu of particularly strong feelings by
anyone, I think the best thing to do is vote.  If a majority vote is
agreeable to everyone, I'll cast mine to start over.

-Nate


> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of D Mount
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:12 AM
> To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> Subject: Re: [eia] potential replacement 
> 
> 
> I could handle doing either as well.  Since I joined after 
> the game started I am curious about the beginning of the game 
> scenarios but I am not opposed to continue with our present 
> game.  I would say it is up to Nate and the situation he is 
> inheriting with Austria. -Danny
> 
> "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While I'm not at all opposed to starting over if needed to 
> attract a seventh, my preference is to keep going with our 
> present game. But I'm happy to do whatever Nate and the rest 
> of you would like.
> 
> -JJY

> > Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> > > At 09:06 PM 3/24/2004 -0600, you wrote:
> > > >My friend Nate Ellefson is interested in joining our 
> game, either 
> > > >as a replacement or starting over. So we need to decide which we 
> > > >want to do.
> > > I'd be willing to do either or both.
> > >
> > > Mike
> >
> > I'm not sure I could handle doing *both*. I'm affraid I'd have too 
> > much trouble remembering what's going on if we were playing 
> two games 
> > at once.

> 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia