Re: [eia] proposal

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Good!  I'm glad to see us reaching consensus.  Since JJ, Jim, Mike,
Joel, and I have all indicated support for this house rule, I think it is
safe to say that it is officially adopted.  So henceforth, losers will split
their losses as dictated by The General's interpretation of the back cover
of the rulebook, and victors will split their gains in the manner we have
just agreed upon (where the number of corps is the primary deciding factor
and the leader is the tie-breaker).

I'm glad that's resolved.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 1:29 AM
Subject: RE: [eia] proposal


> At 05:50 PM 2/28/2004 -0800, you wrote:
> >   Both methods are good, but I think I also agree that the largest force
> >should be the lead force.  Overall, I think this is a very workable
solution
> >and support it.
> I can work this method as well.
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia