RE: [eia] proposal

Michael Gorman on 29 Feb 2004 06:30:09 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] proposal

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [eia] proposal
From: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:29:44 -0600
In-reply-to: <BLEPJGNAGABBIHIPOJLJAECJCFAA.jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <001001c3fe37$60d87240$294e4b0c@KylesDell4500>

At 05:50 PM 2/28/2004 -0800, you wrote:

  Both methods are good, but I think I also agree that the largest force
should be the lead force.  Overall, I think this is a very workable solution
and support it.

I can work this method as well.

Mike


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] proposal
  - From: Kyle H

References:
- Re: [eia] proposal
  - From: Kyle H
- RE: [eia] proposal
  - From: James Helle

Prev by Date: Re: [eia] Turkish forage rolls, November 1807
Next by Date: [eia] Turkish forage rolls, November 1807
Previous by thread: RE: [eia] proposal
Next by thread: Re: [eia] proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread