Joel Uckelman on 8 Feb 2004 16:21:38 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] [escrow] Battle of Florence, October 1807 |
Thus spake "Kyle H": [snip] > So Joel's view isn't crazy, but I do not think it is consistent with > what we have decided in the past. I believe we are *forced* to go against > Joel's interpretation by a previous house rule that we established on this > very issue. Long ago, when a coalition force of British and Spanish troops > was fighting the Russians in/near St. Petersburg, we encountered essentially > the same wording difficulties. Exactly who gains and loses political points > after a battle with multiple parties on one or both sides? At the time we > decided that all the parties on one side gain the full amount if they win, > and they lose the full amount if they lose. (That is, we were siding with > the wording inside the rulebook against the wording on the back cover.) > Since that was our house rule decision earlier in the game, it would be > inconsistent for us to make a different ruling now that only applies to > garrisons. If garrisons are in, then they are in all the way, win or lose. That's a house rule to which I still object, BTW. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia