Kyle H on 3 Feb 2004 22:02:18 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07 |
D'oh! I hunted all through the EIA rules for a definitive word, but I never found it. But there it is: the second sentence of the section I was reading. Oh well... kdh P.S. Once we have the Turkish land orders, we can commence with the killing. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 1:03 AM Subject: Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07 > The EiA rules themselves addresses it directly as well in 10.6 > > -Ev > > On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:42:44 -0500 > "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm not sure it makes sense to say that a leader can remain with foreign > > corps with whom he happens to be combining movement. After all, what would > > happen if, on the next turn, the two allies decided not to combine movement? > > Would the leader become unstacked and be returned to the pool? This, to me, > > would seem to violate the rule against voluntarily unstacking a leader. > > If it matters to anyone, Empires in Harm addresses this point directly. > > In 7.3.11 ("Leaders and Command") it says: > > > > "All leaders, except NELSON or VILLENEUVE, must always be stacked with a > > Corps of that Major Power or controlled minor power when on the map" > > > > I think we should follow EIH's lead on this one and say that you can't leave > > leaders behind with foreign corps. > > > > kdh > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 6:21 PM > > Subject: Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07 > > > > > > > At 05:44 PM 2/2/2004 -0500, you wrote: > > > > I don't think this is possible. Didn't all the Austrian-controlled > > > >corps at Milan move away this turn? Since Charles has to stay with a > > corps > > > >that he started with, he cannot remain in Milan unless I have > > misunderstood > > > >your orders. > > > > > > > >kdh > > > > > > The Turkish corps may have stayed and he is combined with Turkey so I > > would > > > think he could stay with them. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > eia mailing list > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia