Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07

Michael Gorman on 2 Feb 2004 23:22:29 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
From: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:21:44 -0600
In-reply-to: <004601c3e9de$60467e70$214e4b0c@KylesDell4500>
References: <20040201232846.4166.SPIRITMAST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <001101c3e9d3$2efc8c20$396a15ce@Giskard> <20040202162041.4178.SPIRITMAST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

At 05:44 PM 2/2/2004 -0500, you wrote:

    I don't think this is possible.  Didn't all the Austrian-controlled
corps at Milan move away this turn?  Since Charles has to stay with a corps
that he started with, he cannot remain in Milan unless I have misunderstood
your orders.

kdh

The Turkish corps may have stayed and he is combined with Turkey so I wouldthink he could stay with them.




_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
  - From: Kyle H

References:
- [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
  - From: Everett E. Proctor
- Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
  - From: J.J. Young
- Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
  - From: Everett E. Proctor
- Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
  - From: Kyle H

Prev by Date: Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
Next by Date: Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
Next by thread: Re: [eia] Austrian phase 10/07
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread