Kyle H on 26 Jan 2004 14:21:32 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase |
JJ's right. Stockholm should be at 1- resulting in a loss of 2 factors. As I was taking these losses off the map, I realized that the map I sent last night had a mistake: I had not removed the Spanish depots at Stockholm and Madrid. Next up is Prussia followed by Austria/Turkey. (Turkey only has 4 corps and a leader in/near Italy left to move.) Then we move on to November. kdh ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:09 AM Subject: Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase > > I think that the Benghazi garrison had to forage at 0- because it is a > > city with one spire and it had 5 or more occupants. So that garrison > should > > lose 2 factors, not 1. > > I assume that the guerrilla factor moving to Cuidad Rodrigo will > destroy > > the unmanned British depot there. (Or does that depot have a garrison > that > > I missed somehow?) > > No, no garrison; the depot there is destroyed. However, because of the 12 > factors in Stockholm, the foraging roll there is 1-, not 3-. So the > Stockholm garrison loses 2 factors (a roll of 3 on 1-), the Madrid garrison > loses 1 factor (a roll of 5 on 4-), and the Benghazi garrison loses 2 > factors (a roll of 2 on 0-). Does that sound correct to everyone ? > > -JJY > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia