Kyle H on 26 Jan 2004 14:21:32 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase


    JJ's right.  Stockholm should be at 1- resulting in a loss of 2 factors.
As I was taking these losses off the map, I realized that the map I sent
last night had a mistake: I had not removed the Spanish depots at Stockholm
and Madrid.
    Next up is Prussia followed by Austria/Turkey.  (Turkey only has 4 corps
and a leader in/near Italy left to move.)  Then we move on to November.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Spanish Land Phase


> >     I think that the Benghazi garrison had to forage at 0- because it is
a
> > city with one spire and it had 5 or more occupants.  So that garrison
> should
> > lose 2 factors, not 1.
> >     I assume that the guerrilla factor moving to Cuidad Rodrigo will
> destroy
> > the unmanned British depot there.  (Or does that depot have a garrison
> that
> > I missed somehow?)
>
> No, no garrison; the depot there is destroyed.  However, because of the 12
> factors in Stockholm, the foraging roll there is 1-, not 3-.  So the
> Stockholm garrison loses 2 factors (a roll of 3 on 1-), the Madrid
garrison
> loses 1 factor (a roll of 5 on 4-), and the Benghazi garrison loses 2
> factors (a roll of 2 on 0-).  Does that sound correct to everyone ?
>
> -JJY
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia