Re: [eia] political phase wrapup

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree.  And will not be bothered if people say I should have held off on
my second round orders knowing several minors had gone neutral recently and
therefore gave up the chance by sending my orders in early without leaving
myself time to see if I wanted more in them.

Mike

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] political phase wrapup


>     I thought we said that we were using the Political Phase escrow to
> declare our interest in controlling available minor countries.  Since
France
> was the only one who made a declaration, shouldn't it get control?  (You
> even reminded all of us about this with plenty of time to update our
> orders - in fact, that's what I did.)  I'm not sure why we should engage
in
> a second round on this issue.
>
> kdh

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia