Re: [eia] errata rules

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The current tally (for Everett, J.J., Joel, and Kyle) is:

4 votes against the Overwhelming forces option (so it seems that's a done
deal).

3 unambiguous votes against Forcible access, and Kyle in favor of it only in
the case of controlled minors.

3 votes against option 12.8 (voluntary access only for allies), and no votes
for it at this point.

If anyone else wants to chip in, or if I have misinterpreted anyone's vote,
let us know.
-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] errata rules


> >     There are two brand new sets of rules in the errata which I think we
> > should debate before we decide to include them.  The first new rule is
> > called "Forcible Access" and it reads as follows:
> >
> > 10.3.4 FORCIBLE ACCESS [A]:
> >
> >     The second new rule is called "Overwhelming Numbers" and it reads as
> > follows:
> >
> > 12.3.10 [A]: OVERWHELMING NUMBERS:
>
>
> I am not in favor of adding either of these rules at this point.
>
> -Everett
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia