J.J. Young on 16 Sep 2003 01:56:12 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Battle of Naples, June 1807


Assuming that the Spanish wish to take the pursuit losses as 2 cavalry
factors, all 8 losses (-5 I, -3 C) must be Spanish, not Swedish (4/47 =
.0851).

Am I correct that the Spanish must retreat towards Barcelona, their nearest
depot, and that the nearest space they have access to is the mountains NW of
Naples ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Battle of Naples, June 1807


> Thus spake Joel Uckelman:
> > 1. Spain: no casualties, -0.3 morale
> >    Turkey: 10%, -0.7 morale
> >
> > 2. Spain: 10%, -2.0 morale
> >    Turkey: 10%, -0.8 morale
> >
> > 3. Spain: 10%, -2.6 morale
> >    Turkey: no effect
> >
> > Spain breaks. Apparently the Grand Vizier slept through the first third
> > of the battle. (Or maybe slept through the last 2/3, given his tactical
> > rating.)
> >
> > 3 rounds at -1.5 morale gives pursuit class 3, for 10% on a roll of 2.
> > 15FC * 10% = 2 cavalry equivalents.
> >
> > I'll figure casualties as soon as we know whether II Sweden was in the
> > battle or not.
>
> So, casualties:
>
> 1. Spain: none
>    Turkey: 39 * 10% = 4
>
> 2. Spain: 32 * 10% = 3
>    Turkey: 39 * 10% = 4
>
> 3. Spain: 28 * 10% = 3
>    Turkey: none
>
> Totals:
>
> Turkey: 6FI, 2I and one infantry corps mysteriously vanishes.
> Spain: 6, one of which must be cavalry, plus 2 cavalry equivalents.
>
> Turkey +3PP, Spain -3PP.
>
> Siege roll for Naples to follow.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia