J.J. Young on 16 Sep 2003 01:56:12 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Battle of Naples, June 1807 |
Assuming that the Spanish wish to take the pursuit losses as 2 cavalry factors, all 8 losses (-5 I, -3 C) must be Spanish, not Swedish (4/47 = .0851). Am I correct that the Spanish must retreat towards Barcelona, their nearest depot, and that the nearest space they have access to is the mountains NW of Naples ? -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:25 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Battle of Naples, June 1807 > Thus spake Joel Uckelman: > > 1. Spain: no casualties, -0.3 morale > > Turkey: 10%, -0.7 morale > > > > 2. Spain: 10%, -2.0 morale > > Turkey: 10%, -0.8 morale > > > > 3. Spain: 10%, -2.6 morale > > Turkey: no effect > > > > Spain breaks. Apparently the Grand Vizier slept through the first third > > of the battle. (Or maybe slept through the last 2/3, given his tactical > > rating.) > > > > 3 rounds at -1.5 morale gives pursuit class 3, for 10% on a roll of 2. > > 15FC * 10% = 2 cavalry equivalents. > > > > I'll figure casualties as soon as we know whether II Sweden was in the > > battle or not. > > So, casualties: > > 1. Spain: none > Turkey: 39 * 10% = 4 > > 2. Spain: 32 * 10% = 3 > Turkey: 39 * 10% = 4 > > 3. Spain: 28 * 10% = 3 > Turkey: none > > Totals: > > Turkey: 6FI, 2I and one infantry corps mysteriously vanishes. > Spain: 6, one of which must be cavalry, plus 2 cavalry equivalents. > > Turkey +3PP, Spain -3PP. > > Siege roll for Naples to follow. > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia