Kyle H on 30 Aug 2003 17:22:43 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] siege forage |
Since field battles come before sieges, I'll hold off on my siege roll. kdh ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [eia] siege forage > No corps at La Rochelle retire, but the corps at Cherbourg does. We'll need > escrows for the field battles at Brest and La Rochelle. > > -JJY > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 9:34 AM > Subject: Re: [eia] siege forage > > > > > 1 > > > 3 > > > > > > > My low-rolling ways continue, and both garrisons survive. So *now* > > there will be a field combat at Brest, a field combat at La Rochelle, and > > the British must decide whether there will be a siege or a field combat at > > Cherbourg. (GB must also declare whether any of the corps at La Rochelle > > will retire into the city.) > > > > kdh > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia