Re: [eia] Russian Land Phase

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Thanks.  I had been thinking of the language in 7.2 that says, "The same
depots may be removed, then placed, etc. any number of times..." I thought
that meant that you could do creation and removal in any order.  But now I
see that you are right.  Now that I look at it, it is quite clear that
removal is supposed to happen before creation.
    But my misunderstanding is immaterial to the case at hand.  Mike wants
to remove the depot at Minsk (which does not destroy the depot north of
Minsk), then he wants to place a depot at Vitebsk.  Since you can always
create a new depot in a city in your home country, I see no problem with
that either.  Once the one in Vitebsk is created, then a supply line exists
allowing the creation of a depot at Vilna.
    I'm not sure I understand JJ and Everett's objections.  Could you
explain them again?

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian Land Phase


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> > > I am dubious, because of the fact that depot removal is completed
before
> > > depot creation,
> >
> >     Where does it say that depot removal is completed before depot
creation?
> > I recall reading rules language indicating that depot creation and
removal
> > can occur in any order (and that one need not be completed before the
> > other).  (After all, there is no separate "Depot Removal Step" followed
by a
> > "Depot Creation Step."  Rather, there is only a "Depot Creation/Removal
> > Step.")
> >
> > kdh
>
> The first two sentences of 7.2 say that.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia