Re: [eia] Russian Land Phase

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 01:06 AM 8/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> I agree with Joel and J.J. here.
>
> -Everett
> >
> > The 'existing' part of "an already existing (before this Turn) depot"
> > indicates to me that the relevant depot has continued to exist into the
> > present. But at the point when you're attempting to place a depot at 
> Vilna,
> > there is no longer a depot at Minsk. So I think the placement at Vilna
> > isn't legal.
> >
> > --
> > J.
> >
I'm not using the depot at Minsk to place it.  I'm using the depot north of 
Minsk which existed last turn and continues to exist this turn.  What 
changes is the supply source the depot north of Minsk connects to.  So the 
question is not does the depot have to exist from last turn, since it does, 
the question is does the entire supply chain have to exist from the 
previous turn in order for it to be extended.  I don't believe that's how 
the rule reads.

Mike



_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia