RE: [eia] Re: small rules question

[Danny Mount <mount.23@xxxxxxx>]

I think if the supplier has to pay for both himself and his ally then it should be one grand total (without rounding first).  I only think this should be the case since the payment is happening at the same time for both the supplier and the ally he is paying for.

 

-DEM

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of J.J. Young
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:20 AM
To: eia@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eia] Re: small rules question

>P.S.  JJ, I don't really have a reasonable approach to resolving your rules question.  That is, I cannot think of any convincing reasoning on one side or the other.  So I'll >just vote my selfish interests in this case which are to have you round $0.5 twice.  But, as you said, I won't cry any tears if the vote goes against me.

 

OK, I'll just cancel out your selfish vote for rounding up twice with my own selfish vote to combine totals before rounding.  There.  Now we can leave it up to the others to decide.  :-)

 

-JJY