Re: [eia] political points after a battle

[menexenus@xxxxxxx]

   The win-all/lose-all option is fine by me.  And it keeps us consistent with 
what we've done in the past.  (We wouldn't have to go back and change 
anything.)  
   Thanks to JJ for bringing up this issue so that we could all consider its 
implications.  So the political results of 2nd St. Pete are that Russia gains 
3 PP, GB loses 3 PP, and Spain loses 3 PP.
   As I recall, JJ and I have mentioned another issue to each other in 
conversation that should also be resolved.  Namely, what happens to a garrison 
that is in a country that reverts to neutrality?  Does anyone know of the 
specific rule for that eventuality?

kdh
> > We've had naval battles in which fleets from more than one power were 
> > involved on a side. How did we handle political points then? Whichever way 
> > we decide, both of these situations should be handled the same way.
> 
> With naval battles in the past, both combined allies recieved the full PPs for 
> the victory (I don't believe we've yet had a naval battle where combined allies 
> lost).  Anyway, who is "in command" in a naval battle ?  This is another 
> example of why I'm strongly against the interpretation of giving PP gains for a 
> win only to the commander's country.
> 
> -JJY
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia