Kyle H on 29 Mar 2003 13:56:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] you're absolutely right |
Mike wrote: > We're playing nations at war. Russia is currently being attacked by a huge > force and if the coalition attacking is allowed to rewrite every error they > make, I might as well just unconditionally surrender now and not bother > playing the rest of the game. The game is won and lost on errors and if we > allow infinite rewriting then the game devolves from strategy to a simple > punch fest. I'm bigger than you, I cannot make errors, so I win. > I honestly don't see the game the same way you do. I don't see it as being won or lost on the basis of errors - or at least not the kind of errors I'm talking about. (I've been talking about correcting stupid, obvious errors, not the kind of hindsight errors where I say to myself in September "Gee, I wish I hadn't attacked the Papacy back in March.") I see this game as being won or lost on the basis of strategy, diplomacy, and a bit of luck. If I thought this game were all about who makes the fewest stupid errors, then I wouldn't really be interested in playing it. Oh well, it doesn't really matter... kdh _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia