Re: [eia] political phase escrow

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Everett makes a great point.  Besides, a little slowdown over
Christmas/New Year's is no real hardship.  It's to be expected.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] political phase escrow


> I really don't think that this is such a long delay that we can't wait.
In this type of game, I'm sort of against one player sending in the
> orders for another player, even if they are allies. Being mostly a
> diplomatic game, I don't think a player should know for absolute
> certainty what another player is going to do.  There should be some
> element of uncertainty left.
>
> -Everett
>
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:23:26 -0500
> "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Just to point this out, guys, if the escrow is set up to require Danny's
reply before sending out the results, we may be waiting a while.  He gave me
permission and instructions for carrying on as his proxie, but this won't
help if the escrow is waiting for Danny himself.
> >
> > -JJY
>
> --
> Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia