J.J. Young on 21 Dec 2002 18:25:01 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] question about multi-national sieges


Don't the rules you are refering to about a party not at war with the attacker apply to field battles, not sieges ?
 
-JJY

    These are all excellent questions.  I think they are answered by close inspection of rule 7.3.8 which explains the movement/attack sequence when there are forces of multiple major powers in a single area.  In particular, I would direct your attention to 7.3.8.4 which says that after an attack has been declared, "[a]ll major powers not at war with the attacker (...) must now leave the area..." moving to whichever adjacent area is closest to their source of supply.  So suppose GB goes before Spain in the land phase and declares a siege attack.  My understanding is that, since Spanish forces are not at war with the attacker (GB), they would have to leave the area immediately.  (Of course, they could return during their land phase and declare an attack, but that would kick the British forces out.)