[eia] Apologies

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Here's the boiled down version of the emailed conversation between Kyle and
I today:

KYLE:  Heads up.  There's this rule about St. P that I want to check that
you're interpreting this way.

J.J.:  No, it should be interpreted this other way.  Read 8.2.1.1.

Kyle:  OK, but I'm pretty sure Mike is interpreting it this other way.

J.J.:  You'd better tell him, then.

Kyle:  I already sent him an email.

J.J.:  OK.

Time passes...

J.J.:  So what did Mike say about that email ?

Kyle:  He hasn't answered yet.  What if Mike went back and changed his
orders ?

J.J:  This is similar to the rule mistake Jim just made about his supply
lines.  Maybe they should both go back and change their orders, if we're
going back at all.

Kyle:  Sounds good.

Other than critiques of the Two Towers, this is the sum total of our
discussion today, which started out as a one-to-one heads up from Kyle, and
only continued one-to-one because we hadn't heard back from Mike, yet.  I
did not intend to handle the matter in any way which was improper or
impolite, and if I have done so, I apologize.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Prussian breach attempts


> At 07:53 PM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >However, at the time the roll request was made the movement and supply
> >orders were believed to be finished (and valid).  Maybe I'm just paranoid
> >Mike, but it sounds as though you're suggesting a reroll (which I oppose
for
> >the stated reason).  My moving my depot would have had zero effect on how
> >the dice fell.   Would the garrisons rather fight or surrender?
>
> No.  You made the rolls before you had a complete set of movement orders
> and then rewrote the movement orders.
>
> You don't get to write the movement orders with the knowledge of the
rolls.
>
> However, Kyle and JJ have apparently been having a rules discussion in the
> absence of everyone else, truly in the spirit of bringing things forward
> early.  They sent me a copy at the end when they were assembling some
> compromise to retroactively change both the Prussian and Russian orders
and
> who knows what else to reflect the various rules people hadn't tracked
down
> yet.  IF they would be willing to share perhaps we can get that over with
> earlier rather than later?
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia