Re: [eia] Prussian land phase- June 1805

[jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Everything Kyle has said about having missed this rule for avery long time also 
applies to me.  Sorry, Jim.

-JJY


Quoting Kyle Haidet <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> >A depot cannot be created west of Brest-Litovsk as it is not a member of a 
> >valid supply chain that existed before the turn began.  The closest depots 
> >could be made at Konigsberg or Warsaw and then by Brest-Litovsk next turn.
> >
> >This would substantially increase the supply costs for Prussia and require 
> >the group attacking Vilna to forage.
> >
> 
>    When I read this email, I thought surely Mike was wrong.  After all,
> Prussia had a corps in the space where it created the depot.  I thought a
> country could always place a depot with an existing corps, especially inside
> the home nation.  However - as I have come to expect - I am wrong and Mike is
> right.  7.2.3 is very specific: "A new depot may be placed within two
> unblocked areas of an already existing (before this Turn) depot that is a
> supply source or which is part of a valid supply chain."  This language is so
> plain, I am at a loss as to how I could have missed its import for so long.
> 
>    So, Jim, please be aware that you are not the only one who misunderstood
> the rule about placing depots.  In any case, you will probably want to
> reconsider your land orders and send out new ones.
> 
> kdh 
>              
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia