jjy on 16 Nov 2002 18:58:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] referendum on 2 House Rules adopted in a previous campaign |
I'm not terribly happy with the house rule, either, but I still see it as weird that a formerly enemy force can carry on war in your own territory against your allies _after the peace treaty_. What is the status of tracing suppply through formerly enemy territory after making peace ? If supply cannot be traced without the permission of the former enemy whose territory you are on, then this would put at least some check on the "willy-nilly" marching to get at allies of the former enemy. If this is the case, then I would agree about dropping the house rule. -JJY Quoting Kyle H <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > ISSUE 1: Timing of Voluntary Access Agreements > I believe we had as a House Rule that Voluntary Access agreements (which > are public knowledge) had to be publicized during the Political Phase. I > forget exactly why we adopted that rule... I vaguely recall that it was in > response to some hypothetical situation that seemed to abuse the lack of > specificity in the rules. But since I can't remember what it was now, I > guess it couldn't have been that important. So in lieu of a reason for > maintaining it, I'm happy to dispense with the requirement that access > agreements are publicized during the Political Phase, if others wish to do > so as well. > > ISSUE 2: The National Borders Rule > Speaking of old House Rules that should probably be abolished... I'm > really losing my enthusiasm for the "minimum number of national borders" > rule we came up with during our last game. The situation was this: France > had just ended a war with Austria, but wished to pursue Spanish troops > deeper into Austrian-controlled territory prior to leaving. At the time, we > decided that it violated the spirit of a peace treaty for a previously enemy > force to be allowed to march willy-nilly across the territory of a former > enemy to get at the former enemy's ally. So we came up with this rule that > says after a peace is made, a withdrawing force must choose a path that > crosses a minimum number of national borders. (A corollary of this rule is > that once you leave previously enemy terriory, you cannot re-enter without > access.) > In retrospect, I think this rule is a bad idea, and I'd like to just > abolish it. The rules already specify that a corps has 6 months to get out > of a country after peace is made. During that six months, the corps should > be able to take whatever path is most convenient. Here's an example of why > this rule is goofy: > Suppose Austria and Prussia have just finished a war with one another. > Let's say that Austria has a corps in the Prussian city of Magdeburg and > Austria has successfully stripped Mecklenburg from Prussia and has a corps > in Lubeck. Our rules would say that the Austrian corps in Magdeburg cannot > traverse (Prussian-controlled) Saxony to get back to Austria. Furthermore, > our House Rule would say that the Austrian corps in Austrian-controlled > Mecklenburg cannot re-enter Prussian territory in order to return home. > Both of these consequences are strange, to say the least. > It is for these reasons that I say we return to the rules as they are > written: you've got 6 months to remove corps from previously enemy > territory and 3 months to remove garrisons. How you do it is completely up > to you. You can traverse as many 'national borders' as you want; you can > leave previously enemy territory and re-enter it if you want. Otherwise, > (i.e., if we keep the House Rule) people will be forced to do very odd > things. (Why should the victor be placed under such unwieldy constraints?) > > If you have an opinion on either of these issues, please let your voice be > heard. > > kdh > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia