[eia] defaults

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    JJ suggests that there be a default assumption only when there are 10 or
fewer garrison factors in a city.  This seems reasonable to me, and I am
willing to endorse it.

kdh

> > ISSUE 1B:  DEFAULTS?  If we say YES to Issue 1A, should we come up with
> > default assumptions regarding whether a city garrison migrates when a
new
> > depot is created?
> >     - The rules have no bearing on this issue.
> >     - In the past, we have had a default (city garrison becomes depot
> > garrison), but that default would not have a clear application in all
> cases.
> > (See previous email for a discussion of difficult cases.)
> >     - My recommendation is NO; depot creators must explicitly decide
which
> > (if any) city garrison factors become depot garrison factors.  Depot
> > creators are to be prompted if necessary to make these decisions.
>
> I vote YES to a default, but only where the eligible factors that could
> become part of the depot garrison number 10 or less.
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia