J.J. Young on 28 Jul 2002 18:51:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[eia] proposed house rule |
Well, I've just reread the previous
discussion, and it brings up the question of, how would we handle the
situation of a corps which is in a city with enemy forces outside, but is not
besieged ? Can it freely leave the area without having to fight a battle
? If it stays, what are the rules for its foraging or supply ?
Can it be supplied ?
BTW, garrisons are not so hard to handle, since
they need no supply unless besieged.
This muddle leads me to the conclusion that we
should just have a house roll that states that:
*Any and all* corps which move into an area
containing an enemy corps that could retire into a city *must* forage or pay for
supply in such a way as to be eligible to besiege the city. If the
defender elects to retire all his forces into the city, or if the attacker
fights and wins a field battle in the land area outside the city, while
defending forces remain inside, the attacker *must* besiege the city during this
land phase.
It therefore wouldn't matter whether the defender
ultimately chooses to retire into the city or not, so no extra emails
required. It avoids the situation of an unbesieged corps in a city
suurounded by enemies. Keep in mind that although the attacker must
besiege the city, there is nothing forcing the attacker to attempt a breach
assault if they don't want to. I think this house rule would greatly
simplify matters in a way that does not interfere with the spirit of the game,
or with the way we've been playing so far.
-JJY
|