Re: [eia] 3/05 Austria land phase

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we can avoid problems in the future by putting contingency clauses
in our land phase orders.  For example:

1 C corps:  Salzburg ---> Turin (5-, or $2 if enemy retires)

How does that solution sound ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] 3/05 Austria land phase


> > 7.3.7.1 seems clear that the defender should decide whether or not to
retire
> > into the city before the attacker decides whether or not to modify their
> > foraging roll with unused movement points.  So I believe France would
have
> > to decide about Davout's corps, then Austria would choose whether to
forage
> > at 4-, forage at 5-, or pay for supply (Everett and Kyle would have to
work
> > out what is fair as far as the forage roll already made sticking or
being
> > rerolled).
>
> If I were to forage, I would use the roll already made.   But since it
> would be (4-) I would choose to use the Bologna supply instead.  This is
> why I used the supply for the second cavalry unit that moved in instead
> of foraging with it.
>
>
>
> > I'm not sure how to handle this in the future, to avoid backtracking.
Any
> > ideas ?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia