Re: [eia] Control of Papacy revisited

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    As I was fixing the control marker for Papacy on my map, I saw that I
forgot to remove the Turkish corps, depot, and leader at Ezurum.  Please let
me know if you find other mistakes.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Control of Papacy revisited


> Yes, I agree.  Fortunately, this doesn't require much backtracking.  Just
> change the control marker, lower Prussia 1 PP and raise Turkey 1 PP (which
> they will lose at the end of March when France conquers it, unless Austria
> intervenes).
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [eia] Control of Papacy revisited
>
>
> > Re-reading the rules,
> >
> > 4.6  "the major power chosen must not be at war with that neutral minor
> > country and may only be an ally of a major power at war with it if there
> > are no non-allies willing or eligible to run it"
> >
> > Therefore, I think we erred and the control of the Papacy should have
> > gone to Turkey.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia