Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, 1805

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    I guess it doesn't much matter, but I have a Turkish corps at Jaffa, not
Jerusalem.  (I've got the Syria corps at Jerusalem.)  Let me know if I'm
wrong.
    In fact, I think I'll just send out my current map.  Let me know if you
see anything wrong with it.  As far as I know, it is up-to-date.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:09 PM
Subject: [eia] Turkish land phase, 1805


> Oops. I sent my land phase orders, but not to the list.
>
> 1I at Constantinople holds (F auto)
> 1C W of Constantinople -> Constantinople (F auto)
> 1C at Nicopolis -> Constantinople (F 2-)
> 1I at Adrianople -> Constantinople (F 4-)
>
> 1I at Erzurum stands down.
> Depot at Erzurum removed.
> Kushanz Ali removed.
>
> 1I at Jerusalem stands down.
> 1C, 1I, Grand Vizier at Damietta -> N of Cairo -> Cairo (F auto, F 3,
> respectively)
>
> Syria holds.
> Tunisia holds.
>
> Does the Egyptian corps retire into the city of Cairo?
>
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

Attachment: EIA0503a.gsn
Description: Binary data