Re: [eia] Turkish Land Phase, Feb 1805

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I noticed the same thing, Mike, but I thought in Turkey's orders the corps
which did not stand down moved in before they went home, and so I assumed
that the leader stayed on the map.  Is this right, Joel ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Turkish Land Phase, Feb 1805


>     When the corps were stood down at Erzurum, did Kushanz Ali stand down
> with them?
>
> This is an order of movement question.  If the corps stood down and then
> the corps from Trabizond moved in, then the leader retired when the entire
> force he was with retired.  If the corps from Trabizond moved first, then
> the leader would remain on the board since his entire force did not stand
> down.  It won't make any supply differences since the corps from Trabizond
> was depot supplied.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia