Kyle H on 3 Jun 2002 22:08:46 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Corps identities |
Joel is absolutely right. Making corps identities public would be a much bigger deal for him than I realized. I was forgetting about the important difference between Turkish feudal corps and regular corps. And, as usual, Mike's is the voice of reason. I think his suggestion is an excellent way of keeping track of things. I recommend it to everyone. Therefore, in light of Joel and Mike's important contributions, I hereby take my suggestion to make corps identities public knowledge off the table. kdh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Corps identities > What I plan on doing is keeping two map files. On one I'll keep my > accurate corps numbers in their accurate locations. On the other, I'll > just toggle through the corps numbers and move them wherever. I used corps > one through 6 of my infantry on the map I sent out because I had 6 infantry > corps. On my other map, I have exact corps numbers in their proper > locations. Looking at cybermap, I think you can put text comments on the > pieces. What I plan on doing is putting other peoples corps on my accurate > map of my own forces, with text comments about what strengths and > identities I believe they have. > Yeah, it's a little bit of work, but one of the big advantages of putting > the map into electronic format is that making and maintaining multiple > copies of things is easy. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia >