Re: [eia] Corps identities

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Joel is absolutely right.  Making corps identities public would be a
much bigger deal for him than I realized.  I was forgetting about the
important difference between Turkish feudal corps and regular corps.  And,
as usual, Mike's is the voice of reason.  I think his suggestion is an
excellent way of keeping track of things.  I recommend it to everyone.
    Therefore, in light of Joel and Mike's important contributions, I hereby
take my suggestion to make corps identities public knowledge off the table.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Corps identities


> What I plan on doing is keeping two map files.  On one I'll keep my
> accurate corps numbers in their accurate locations.  On the other, I'll
> just toggle through the corps numbers and move them wherever.  I used
corps
> one through 6 of my infantry on the map I sent out because I had 6
infantry
> corps.  On my other map, I have exact corps numbers in their proper
> locations.  Looking at cybermap, I think you can put text comments on the
> pieces.  What I plan on doing is putting other peoples corps on my
accurate
> map of my own forces, with text comments about what strengths and
> identities I believe they have.
> Yeah, it's a little bit of work, but one of the big advantages of putting
> the map into electronic format is that making and maintaining multiple
> copies of things is easy.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>