Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly

Sarah Dilling on 22 Oct 2003 03:12:25 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly

To: ALACPP Mailing List <alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
From: sarah@xxxxxxx (Sarah Dilling)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:11:03 -0700
In-reply-to: <200310211959.10270.gunderwoodhsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20031022025006.17401.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1066789513.2487.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200310211959.10270.gunderwoodhsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Nope, it's all of us. I think it has something to do with how his MUA
handles list-munged reply-tos. 

SarahD

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:59:10PM -0700, Greg Underwood wrote:
> 
> Is it just me, or does everyone get two copies of Christopher's emails?
> 
> :D
> 
> -Greg
_______________________________________________
alacpp mailing list
alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
  - From: Christopher Smith

References:
- Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
  - From: Jon Stewart
- Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
  - From: Christopher Smith
- Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
  - From: Greg Underwood

Prev by Date: Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
Next by Date: Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
Previous by thread: Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
Next by thread: Re: [ALACPP] emendation to previous bullshit spoken by yours truly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread