Raymond Lem on 17 Jun 2003 19:23:01 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Was [ALACPP] Meeting? Wigwam for Boost install


Sorry for replying to a digest.  I snipped out the
messages I am not replying to.  Already changed my
subscription options.
< snip digest >
> 
> Message: 5
> Subject: Re: [ALACPP] Meeting?
> From: Christopher Smith <x@xxxxxxxx>
> To: alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 12 Jun 2003 14:44:38 -0700
> Reply-To: alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:43, Kevin Scaldeferri
> wrote:
> > Specifically, there was some comparison of Loki
> functors and Boost 
> > functors, with people seeming to prefer the Boost
> versions.  IIRC, part 
> > of that had to do with how you chain functors.
> Also, Boost bind is more 
> > flexible than the BindFirst mechanism in Loki.
> As I learn more and more about Loki, it seems like
> most of the Loki
> ideas which the Boost people have adopted invariably
> tend to be
> better implemented in Boost.
> 
> > Also, Boost is really hard to install.
> Can we repeat that again? ;-)
> 
> Corey will want us to mention wigwam as a potential
> solution to this
> problem:
> 
> http://www.wigwam-framework.org/
> 
> --Chris

After looking at Chapter 6 of the Wigwam doc, it seems
building a wigwam package for boost would be similar
to building an RPM package. Has anyone done that work
yet?
Or equally likely, did I miss the point?

=====
Raymond Lem
Cell:  (626)712-0883

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
alacpp mailing list
alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp