Raymond Lem on 17 Jun 2003 19:23:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Was [ALACPP] Meeting? Wigwam for Boost install |
Sorry for replying to a digest. I snipped out the messages I am not replying to. Already changed my subscription options. < snip digest > > > Message: 5 > Subject: Re: [ALACPP] Meeting? > From: Christopher Smith <x@xxxxxxxx> > To: alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx > Date: 12 Jun 2003 14:44:38 -0700 > Reply-To: alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx > > On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:43, Kevin Scaldeferri > wrote: > > Specifically, there was some comparison of Loki > functors and Boost > > functors, with people seeming to prefer the Boost > versions. IIRC, part > > of that had to do with how you chain functors. > Also, Boost bind is more > > flexible than the BindFirst mechanism in Loki. > As I learn more and more about Loki, it seems like > most of the Loki > ideas which the Boost people have adopted invariably > tend to be > better implemented in Boost. > > > Also, Boost is really hard to install. > Can we repeat that again? ;-) > > Corey will want us to mention wigwam as a potential > solution to this > problem: > > http://www.wigwam-framework.org/ > > --Chris After looking at Chapter 6 of the Wigwam doc, it seems building a wigwam package for boost would be similar to building an RPM package. Has anyone done that work yet? Or equally likely, did I miss the point? ===== Raymond Lem Cell: (626)712-0883 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ alacpp mailing list alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp