arlo on 15 Jun 2003 18:02:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[ALACPP] Re: Boost PP |
Good point. I hadn't noticed that lack - I'm not really up on the later C developments. You could also make a higher-level library on top of boost's to strengthen its capabilities with vararg macros. I'm sure that they'd like it, as long as it either degrades nicely to pre-C99 preprocessors, or provides only optional facilities and leaves boost PP unchanged. I wonder if anyone's talking about this on their mailing list? I'm so far behind that list that I've got no clue what they're up to, but an archive search might be useful if you're interested in integrating your changes to boost. You might also check out their developer's fileswap space, in the boost yahoo group (don't remember the exact name, but you can probably find it from their website). Arlo > Thanks for the pointer. When I have the time I'm going to convert my functor > implementation to use the boost lib. Although the boost lib seems to be > lacking functions that handle a variable number of macro arguments using the > (...) facility of C99, it might be easy enough to layer that on top of the > boost lib's existing "array" handling > facility. _______________________________________________ alacpp mailing list alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp