Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122

Craig Daniel on Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:22:40 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:22:33 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Nf+QlDQqBdP5xHL8oaXRg1byDAg2zgFcaP4bsPK8iDM=; b=dJcev8sgaJ9UpaC7lZ4PodEHvmNvS4uy3SmXaceU88B0pS8HsOPevL5P5ryB0PjVWW d1DGytysnBcrZVIEUUoA4aE34Iyoz2Z+fYIl0wwVsjXy6GBYgdrwrkPr3cbZDPJbpsI6 gnXqPBnK19sag/CMFj6SqwjTptrDPE/TNXHvQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ecP5fdMLzAjKxZwjCfM7o/gA9Nvfj+3bqnpY/XWqxLHM/CviYvNvZl2RFL444lSHle aCR8Rx/FR84hYrFWIXrVjwlpOq+humDbm1ClQHFpucJT4WO2f7v3cbjEecPVwG8mIepF wWdLh7ZXxuKtPNHR8/PznphQwUUnMpMKHPfJs=
In-reply-to: <4C509D6C.1040807@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTi=+z1X=9ibbj-EPVcSnSemdAhYdxGEagCD85qij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W629D07B9E918801A3D36E285A70@xxxxxxx> <4C4F342F.2000008@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikt357=JNLbXUGdZiKk7VyEsFjj8fzQf9ovTA0w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C509D6C.1040807@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "X holds the title Y" (as defined by Rule 60) is arguably a separate
> concept from "X's name is Y", due to the distinct verb.

I don't think "hold" and "have" are meaningfully distinct under the
current ruleset, given that physical grasping of Nomic posessions
(names or otherwise) does not occur.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI - I am named uniquely
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread