Charles Walker on Wed, 27 May 2009 12:06:25 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:57 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
> > /* The following proposal/PoO (depending on the current ruleset)
> > merges the essential elements of the current Agoran rules with the
> > essential elements of the probably-current B Nomic rules; the intent
> > is to create a game that is recognizably B but with some of the
> > stability of Agora. In general, rules numbering less than 100 are
> > inessential B Nomic rules (with the exception of the very essential
> > Rule 0), rules numbered 101-200 are significant Agoran rules, rules
> > numbered 201-300 are essential B Nomic rules, and rules numbered 301
> > or higher are either new rules introduced to help fuse the two
> > rulesets or rules that fused corresponding rules out of both old
> > rulesets. This strips us of contract law and gameplay, both of which
> > ought to be reinserted either by non-emergent means or by subsequent
> > Points of Order. */
> If we're under the Agora-like ruleset - and I think we are - you'll have
> to set its Adoption Index to at least 3 for it to work.

And specify a non-simultaneous order for the rule changes to be made in.

C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
spoon-discuss mailing list